<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I had a font in Africa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fawny.org/2005/08/11/stander/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2005/08/11/stander/</link>
	<description>blog.fawny.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19861</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hairdon’t – Le «blog personnel» de Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2005/08/11/stander/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Hairdon’t – Le «blog personnel» de Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/2005/08/11/stander/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>[...] It is obviously important to make sure that props are accurate and of the right vintage when shooting a period piece. But fonts are just letters; they all look the same and they have all existed unchanged for as long as movie producers can remember. Because typographic ahistoricism actually never happens in the movies – at all. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is obviously important to make sure that props are accurate and of the right vintage when shooting a period piece. But fonts are just letters; they all look the same and they have all existed unchanged for as long as movie producers can remember. Because typographic ahistoricism actually never happens in the movies – at all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

