<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes from FCC interventions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fawny.org/2006/03/09/tdi-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2006/03/09/tdi-fcc/</link>
	<description>blog.fawny.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19861</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The freakonomics of captioning errors – Le «blog personnel» de Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2006/03/09/tdi-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>The freakonomics of captioning errors – Le «blog personnel» de Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/2006/03/09/tdi-fcc/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>[...] I was thinking about this while reading the many FCC interventions. Let’s start with real-time captioning, that is, captioning produced by a stenographic process. It is ordinarily reserved for live events, but now also used by cheap-ass producers who don’t give a shit about captioning and shop only on price. Qualified stenotypists can produce 180 words a minute for long periods. That’s actually a conservative estimate. My esteemed colleague Gary D. Robson, who really should start answering my E-mails, writes in The Closed Captioning Handbook: “Real-time stenocaptioners must regularly work at sustained speeds of over 225 words per minute with accuracy of 99% or better.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was thinking about this while reading the many FCC interventions. Let’s start with real-time captioning, that is, captioning produced by a stenographic process. It is ordinarily reserved for live events, but now also used by cheap-ass producers who don’t give a shit about captioning and shop only on price. Qualified stenotypists can produce 180 words a minute for long periods. That’s actually a conservative estimate. My esteemed colleague Gary D. Robson, who really should start answering my E-mails, writes in The Closed Captioning Handbook: “Real-time stenocaptioners must regularly work at sustained speeds of over 225 words per minute with accuracy of 99% or better.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

