http://blog.fawny.org/2006/06/24/failed3/ blog.fawny.org Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:45:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare hourly 1 http://blog.fawny.org/2006/06/24/failed3/comment-page-1/#comment-1835 When failure is an option ¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:22:17 +0000 http://blog.fawny.org/2006/06/24/failed3/#comment-1835 [...] hugely wrong, I publish a correction and leave the original up for posterity (first example; second). The stone-tablets analogy is not actually as imperfect as one might think, given the work I put [...] [...] hugely wrong, I publish a correction and leave the original up for posterity (first example; second). The stone-tablets analogy is not actually as imperfect as one might think, given the work I put [...]

]]> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/06/24/failed3/comment-page-1/#comment-705 Unfailed Redesign: AIGA – Le «blog personnel» de Joe Clark Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:06:48 +0000 http://blog.fawny.org/2006/06/24/failed3/#comment-705 [...] As implied in a corrected post in June 2006, the AIGA is an Unfailed Redesign, as we officially learn today. Design sites sometimes do do Web standards. [...] [...] As implied in a corrected post in June 2006, the AIGA is an Unfailed Redesign, as we officially learn today. Design sites sometimes do do Web standards. [...]

]]> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/06/24/failed3/comment-page-1/#comment-508 Unfailed Redesigns – Le «blog personnel» de Joe Clark Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:29:35 +0000 http://blog.fawny.org/2006/06/24/failed3/#comment-508 [...] OK, why has it been eventful here at Châlet Redesigns trompés? Because I got one of the previous entries totally wrong (corrected the same day it was pointed out), and because two really impressively successful Toronto developers are acting like total twats in leaving demeaning comments about me posted on their site. And this was after I declared their work Not a Failed Redesign. But hey! They’ve got more money than I do (you should see their office and one partner’s Cinema Display), so it’s OK for them to act as a conduit for outright character defamation. My assumption is as I stated before: They think I have something coming to me and this will do for starters. [...] [...] OK, why has it been eventful here at Châlet Redesigns trompés? Because I got one of the previous entries totally wrong (corrected the same day it was pointed out), and because two really impressively successful Toronto developers are acting like total twats in leaving demeaning comments about me posted on their site. And this was after I declared their work Not a Failed Redesign. But hey! They’ve got more money than I do (you should see their office and one partner’s Cinema Display), so it’s OK for them to act as a conduit for outright character defamation. My assumption is as I stated before: They think I have something coming to me and this will do for starters. [...]

]]>