http://blog.fawny.org/2006/07/07/ckearprint/ blog.fawny.org Thu, 26 May 2011 13:52:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19896 http://blog.fawny.org/2006/07/07/ckearprint/comment-page-1/#comment-1510 Accessible signage: A boondoggle in the making ¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:20:14 +0000 http://blog.fawny.org/2006/07/07/ckearprint/#comment-1510 [...] – about which they have exactly none when it comes to accessibility of signage. The entire “Ckear Print”’fiasco barely scratches the surface of it; I have an entire folder of documentation on how the [...] [...] – about which they have exactly none when it comes to accessibility of signage. The entire “Ckear Print”’fiasco barely scratches the surface of it; I have an entire folder of documentation on how the [...]

]]> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/07/07/ckearprint/comment-page-1/#comment-935 OCAD grad show 2007 ¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto Mon, 14 May 2007 04:06:37 +0000 http://blog.fawny.org/2006/07/07/ckearprint/#comment-935 [...] While some of the remaining materials they read may have a kind of “classic” print accessibility, like large-print books (about which the type research is seriously equivocal), everything else is gonna be the same shitty fonts we deal with every day. Like using Arial for everything – exactly what Karin’s comrades at CNIB did when typesetting their little brochure on how to make typesetting accessible to the blind. (The phrase “Clear Print” came up a lot in Karin’s portfolio.) [...] [...] While some of the remaining materials they read may have a kind of “classic” print accessibility, like large-print books (about which the type research is seriously equivocal), everything else is gonna be the same shitty fonts we deal with every day. Like using Arial for everything – exactly what Karin’s comrades at CNIB did when typesetting their little brochure on how to make typesetting accessible to the blind. (The phrase “Clear Print” came up a lot in Karin’s portfolio.) [...]

]]>