<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ‘This movie sucks,’ say the fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/</link>
	<description>blog.fawny.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19896</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recognizable addition to the Cinema of Recognition  ¶  Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/comment-page-1/#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>Recognizable addition to the Cinema of Recognition  ¶  Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>[...] If, as I keep saying, pace Edmund White, that the function of gay literature is to induce the reader to nod and mutter “yes,” then the lesson I have learned from a quarter-century’s experience is that gay cinema is the Cinema of Recognition. If you can’t recognize yourself, the picture doesn’t work. Conversely, the only way a picture can work is if its portrayals are recognizable. Gay cinema is more steeped in archetypes than black comedies the fonts on whose posters tell you they suck. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If, as I keep saying, pace Edmund White, that the function of gay literature is to induce the reader to nod and mutter “yes,” then the lesson I have learned from a quarter-century’s experience is that gay cinema is the Cinema of Recognition. If you can’t recognize yourself, the picture doesn’t work. Conversely, the only way a picture can work is if its portrayals are recognizable. Gay cinema is more steeped in archetypes than black comedies the fonts on whose posters tell you they suck. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This movie is sincere, say the squiggles ¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/comment-page-1/#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>This movie is sincere, say the squiggles ¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>[...] Because if we used Flyer or Futura or even Gill Kayo, it would mean “this movie sucks.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Because if we used Flyer or Futura or even Gill Kayo, it would mean “this movie sucks.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steamfitting ¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>Steamfitting ¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/2007/07/22/flyerextrabold/#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>[...] In other words, “This movie sucks,” say the fonts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In other words, “This movie sucks,” say the fonts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

