<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto &#187; ‘Eye’ magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fawny.org/category/graphic-design/dcrit/eye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fawny.org</link>
	<description>blog.fawny.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19896</generator>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ 81</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/12/29/eye81/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/12/29/eye81/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=4545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Poynor disingenuously states that graphic-design history picks winners and losers. He’s one of the pickers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/12/29/eye81/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ 80: The doll’s-house effect</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/10/03/eye80/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/10/03/eye80/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=4311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue 80 of <cite>Eye</cite> is riven with structural defects and contradictions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/10/03/eye80/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steven Heller, sycophant</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/07/28/heller-walters/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/07/28/heller-walters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=4064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<cite>Eye</cite>’s lead writer “interviews” its editor for the blog of a rival publication]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/07/28/heller-walters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ 78 &amp; 79</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/07/26/eye78-79/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/07/26/eye78-79/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=4059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Winter 2010 and Spring 2011. Did you know Ontario Hydro was “state-owned”?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/07/26/eye78-79/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ 76 &amp; 77</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/02/12/eye76-77/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/02/12/eye76-77/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=3468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best design magazine <em>ever</em> continues its decline]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2011/02/12/eye76-77/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ visits Berlin, unnoticed</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2010/02/05/eye74/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2010/02/05/eye74/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=2805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<cite>Eye</cite>’s “Berlin special” is more like a series of blog posts, which, oddly, they also published]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2010/02/05/eye74/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jessica Jenkins’ tin eye</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/10/24/jenkins-tineye/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/10/24/jenkins-tineye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=2526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only <cite>Eye</cite> would publish a cultural interpretation of modern typography in which the only font identified by name isn’t even used in any of the samples]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/10/24/jenkins-tineye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ 72</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/08/09/eye72/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/08/09/eye72/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=2379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All Bantjes all the time!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/08/09/eye72/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ 71</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/07/12/eye71/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/07/12/eye71/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=2284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who’s the latest victim of <cite>Eye</cite>’s critical condescension? Hint: Think Cherry Blossom]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/07/12/eye71/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Eye’ 69 &amp; 70</title>
		<link>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/02/19/69-70/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/02/19/69-70/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[‘Eye’ magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The death of graphic-design criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fawny.org/?p=1933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You spent $34 per issue. I just borrowed them from the library. What’s in ’em?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fawny.org/2009/02/19/69-70/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

