Archive for category: Web standards

‘Dating’ sites do Web standards    (2006.04.15)

In which your author posts a personal ad under the username FailedRedesigns. Tell me, do you think the site will have valid HTML?

Border colic    (2006.01.19)

Listen, you try getting the borders and backgrounds off a linked image

Failed Redesigns    (2006.01.04)

Failed Redesigns of 2005: “Because You Should Have Known Better”

Design sites do Web standards II    (2005.11.09)

Do design ‘portals’ still have crappy HTML? (Yes.) And what does this have to do with Armin Vit?

Standards testing and small caps    (2005.11.08)

More bookmarks for standards testing, and a new test page for true CSS small caps

Joe 1, Opera fanboys 0    (2005.10.21)

A tab is a tab, people.

Negligée update    (2005.10.11)

What was said at the NLGJA conference about Weblogs. And how many validation errors does Out.com have today?

Google severity index: +2    (2005.10.04)

Google now employs two of the three severest standardistas roaming the earth

Shorter Tantek    (2005.10.02)

address vs. dl: Who’s making the mistake?