Archive for category: The death of graphic-design criticism
The long, slow, deserved death of “traditional” graphic-design criticism. Its practitioners will be the last to know
- Superexclusive conservative-design update (2018.03.01)
-
Brad Parscale and Sabo (and Michael Bierut)
- ‘Super-Cannes’ locations (2014.09.05)
-
Rick Poynor: Locations in Super-Cannes
- ‘Eye’ 87 (2014.07.12)
-
No review of the “Food Special Issue.” Eye is a fraud. (Project concluded as of 2014.11.03)
- ‘Eye’ 86 (2013.11.17)
-
Issue 86 of Eye: Letraset as historical artifact no more important than Polish protest posters, and get that fucking hair out of your eyelash, Alice Rawsthorn
- ‘Eye’ 85 (2013.08.28)
-
In issue 85 of Eye, the biggest charlatans of the year: Lust (sic)
- Daring critique of design criticism (2013.07.07)
-
Are pizza flyers good design? Don’t ask a design intellectual
- (Re)vision(ism) of ACT UP (demo)graphics (2013.06.23)
-
Some dumb twat retypeset “ACT UP” with Arial. And nominating Julianne Escobedo Shepherd as buzzword-wielding vizmin of the year
- ‘Eye’ 84 (2013.03.05)
-
Eye’s Monotype special, in which Ultrasparky has never seemed more Ultrastilted
- ‘Eye’ 83 (2013.01.22)
-
Eye 83, filled to the brim with features on designers you’ve read about for decades and other designers so successful they don’t need clients anymore