Archive for category: The death of graphic-design criticism
The long, slow, deserved death of “traditional” graphic-design criticism. Its practitioners will be the last to know
- ‘Eye’ 71 (2009.07.12)
-
Who’s the latest victim of Eye’s critical condescension? Hint: Think Cherry Blossom
- ‘Women of Design’ (2009.06.27)
-
Why aren’t there more wymmynz in graphic design? This new book answers a nonsensical question
- Death, be not ladder-climbing (2009.06.16)
-
Have you missed Speak Up? Or have Armin Vit’s numerous other blogs picked up the slack?
- Special warning to the Krit Kidz (2009.02.21)
-
Do you think we should be training design writers to talk down to the “masses”?
- ‘Eye’ 69 & 70 (2009.02.19)
-
You spent $34 per issue. I just borrowed them from the library. What’s in ’em?
- ‘The Solitary Vice’ (2009.02.09)
-
Don’t read books if you don’t want to, Mikita Brottman does not quite argue. Now, what does this have to do with designers?
- ‘ “Web designer” is often a codeword for “unwashed loser” ’ (2008.09.05)
-
Yes, that’s what the editor of Eye really says
- Ever less relevant (2008.08.24)
-
As I am the only person willing to critcize Eye, I might as well give it another go (Spring 2008, Nº 67)